Contradiction with 1 Samuel 16:7
God looks at the heart, not the outward appearance, contrary to Leviticus 21:18's emphasis on physical perfection.
1 Samuel 16:7: But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for [the LORD seeth] not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. [outward...: Heb. eyes]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
In Christ, there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, suggesting equality despite human distinctions, contrasting with the exclusions based on physical imperfections in Leviticus 21:18.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
God shows no partiality and accepts those from every nation who fear Him and do what is right, which opposes the exclusionary stance in Leviticus 21:18 regarding physical blemishes.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction is the idea of fairness and equality. Many believe that God sees everyone as equal, yet this verse seems to impose restrictions based on physical appearance, which could be seen as inconsistent with the belief in equal worth and dignity for all people.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or inconsistency with Leviticus 21:18 might arise when compared to the teachings of the New Testament, specifically the message of equality and inclusivity found in passages like Galatians 3:28, which states that all are one in Christ. While Leviticus 21:18 sets certain restrictions based on physical conditions, the New Testament emphasizes spiritual equality regardless of physical attributes. This can seem inconsistent in terms of inclusivity and equality in religious community roles.
Paradox #3
This verse has been seen as contradictory to modern values of equality and non-discrimination. It suggests people with physical imperfections should not perform certain religious duties, which conflicts with contemporary beliefs that everyone should have equal opportunities regardless of their physical condition.
Paradox #4
This verse suggests that physical imperfections or disabilities are grounds for exclusion from certain religious duties. This conflicts with modern scientific understanding and social values that emphasize inclusivity and recognize that physical differences do not determine a person's worth or capability.
Paradox #5
This verse might seem morally contradictory because it sets conditions for who can serve in special religious roles based on physical appearance or disabilities. This can conflict with the idea of valuing all people equally regardless of their physical condition.