Contradiction with Matthew 9:12-13
Jesus emphasizes compassion and mercy over strict adherence to ritual law, suggesting that societal and ritual exclusions are not in line with his teachings.
Matthew 9:12-13: But when Jesus heard [that], he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
Contradiction with Mark 2:27
This verse indicates that the Sabbath and laws were made for man's benefit, not to impose undue restriction, contrasting with the exclusionary nature of Levitical laws.
Mark 2:27: And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Declares the unity and equality of believers in Christ, contradicting any form of exclusion based on physical condition or status as outlined in Leviticus.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter's revelation that God does not show favoritism and accepts people from every nation contrasts with laws that exclude specific individuals.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Paradox #1
Leviticus 21:23 could be seen as inconsistent with the idea of equality and acceptance found in other parts of religious texts. The verse seems to restrict certain people from performing specific religious duties due to physical imperfections, which may conflict with the broader theological themes of inclusivity and the belief that all individuals are equal in the eyes of God.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 21:23 could appear to contradict the idea of equality and inclusiveness. It places restrictions on who can perform certain religious duties based on physical conditions, which might seem inconsistent with the belief that all people are equal before God regardless of their physical state. This could conflict with more inclusive messages found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the ancient cultural context regarding physical imperfections and religious service, contrasting with modern views on equality and inclusion. In ancient times, certain physical conditions could restrict individuals from specific religious roles, whereas today, such restrictions are often seen as discriminatory.
Paradox #4
Leviticus 21:23 could be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical message that all individuals are equal in the eyes of God. This verse imposes restrictions on certain individuals from participating in specific religious duties due to physical imperfections, which might seem to conflict with the idea that everyone is created equally and with inherent dignity.