Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states that there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, contradicting the exclusivity mentioned in Leviticus 22:12 regarding who may eat of holy things.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
This verse says, "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common," contradicting the restrictions placed on holy food consumption in Leviticus 22:12.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
This verse indicates that it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, contradicting the dietary restrictions implied in Leviticus 22:12 for the consumption of holy things.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
This passage declares all foods clean, challenging the restrictions in Leviticus 22:12 about specific regulations on who may eat consecrated meals.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Romans 14:3
This verse emphasizes acceptance without passing judgment on dietary practices, contradicting the strict rules applied in Leviticus 22:12.
Romans 14:3: Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
Paradox #1
The verse in question might be seen as conflicting with the New Testament's themes of inclusion and breaking down barriers between different groups of people. Specifically, where the New Testament often talks about all believers being equal in Christ, this Old Testament rule sets specific restrictions based on status or circumstance. This can seem inconsistent with the more inclusive teachings found later in the Bible.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 22:12 touches on specific rules about priestly families and holiness. A potential contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing these rules with other parts of the Bible or historical practices, where there might be differing regulations or expectations for priests and their families. Additionally, cultural changes over time could lead to different interpretations or applications of such rules, creating confusion or conflict within historical contexts.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 22:12 discusses rules about who may eat certain holy offerings. A moral conflict might arise if someone feels these rules unjustly exclude certain people, like women who marry outside their religious community, suggesting inequality. This could clash with modern views on fairness and equal treatment, creating tension between ancient laws and contemporary values.