Contradiction with Romans 3:28
Leviticus 22:17 emphasizes offerings and rituals, while Romans 3:28 emphasizes justification by faith, not by works or rituals.
Romans 3:28: Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
Leviticus 22:17 implies the importance of animal offerings, while Hebrews 10:4 states it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Leviticus 22:17 focuses on specific ritual laws, whereas Colossians 2:16-17 suggests that such rituals were a shadow of things to come and no longer binding.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Leviticus 22:17 adheres to the law as necessary, while Galatians 3:24-25 explains that the law was a guardian until Christ came, indicating a shift from the law's requirements.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.