Contradiction with Malachi 1:8
This verse criticizes offering blind or lame sacrifices, whereas Leviticus 22:23 permits offering an animal with a deformity as a freewill offering but not for a vow.
Malachi 1:8: And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, [is it] not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, [is it] not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts. [for: Heb. to]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 17:1
This verse explicitly forbids sacrificing any animal with a blemish, which seems stricter than the allowance made in Leviticus 22:23 for certain offerings.
Deuteronomy 17:1: Thou shalt not sacrifice unto the LORD thy God [any] bullock, or sheep, wherein is blemish, [or] any evilfavouredness: for that [is] an abomination unto the LORD thy God. [sheep: or, goat]
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in this verse may arise from the allowance of offering an animal with certain defects as a freewill offering, but not for fulfilling vows. This can seem inconsistent because it implies a different standard for different types of offerings, which might be seen as unequal treatment of offerings based on their purpose.