Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Leviticus 22:28 allows the killing of animals for sacrifice, while Exodus 20:13 commands "Thou shalt not kill," which can be interpreted as a call to value life.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
Leviticus 22:28 deals with sacrificial practices, whereas Isaiah 1:11 questions the value of animal sacrifices, emphasizing a preference for heartfelt devotion over rituals.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Contradiction with Matthew 9:13
Leviticus 22:28 outlines sacrificial rules, but Matthew 9:13 emphasizes mercy over sacrifice, suggesting a shift away from ritual animal offerings.
Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
Leviticus 22:28 focuses on sacrificial laws, while Hosea 6:6 highlights God's preference for mercy and knowledge over sacrifices.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction or inconsistency related to this could involve differing practices or beliefs about animal sacrifice or treatment across various cultures and religions in ancient times. Some cultures might have had different rules or no rules regarding the treatment of animals and their offspring, leading to contrasting practices. These differences could create tension or inconsistency when comparing the biblical text to the practices of other societies of the time.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency of Leviticus 22:28 could be seen in the way it appears to value animal life. While this verse advises against killing an animal and its offspring on the same day, the greater context of Leviticus includes numerous laws permitting animal sacrifice. This might seem inconsistent, as it sets a specific boundary on certain killings while broadly accepting others, suggesting a complex view on the sanctity of animal life.