Contradiction with Romans 14:5
This verse suggests that every person can esteem different days above others, implying personal freedom in choosing which days to observe, contrasting Leviticus 23:31's command on observing specific days as a statute forever.
Romans 14:5: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
It advises not to let others judge you regarding the observance of holy days, suggesting a more flexible approach that contrasts with the strict observance required in Leviticus 23:31.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Galatians 4:9-10
Paul criticizes returning to observing special days as bondage, which contradicts the command to observe certain days forever in Leviticus 23:31.
Galatians 4:9-10: But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? [turn ye again: or, turn ye back] [elements: or, rudiments]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 23:31 discusses the observance of a specific Sabbath as a day of complete rest, where work is prohibited. A potential theological conflict could arise when comparing this with the New Testament teachings, particularly in how Jesus addressed Sabbath laws. For instance, in the Gospels, Jesus heals and performs other acts on the Sabbath, emphasizing mercy and human need over strict rest. This difference in interpretation of Sabbath observance between Old and New Testament teachings could be seen as a contradiction for those trying to reconcile strict law adherence with the message of love and compassion found in the life of Jesus.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 23:31 talks about not doing any work on a specific holy day. A historical inconsistency could arise when comparing this requirement with the practical needs and economic activities of ancient societies where taking a full day off might have been challenging. This could create a conflict between religious obligations and daily life demands.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 23:31 talks about a strict rest and a prohibition on work during a religious festival. A potential contradiction or conflict might arise if this strict rule conflicts with the needs or responsibilities of individuals, such as caring for the sick or emergency work that saves lives. For some, this could seem inconsistent with broader moral or ethical duties to help others or respond to urgent needs.