Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises turning the other cheek instead of exacting punishment, contrasting the directive to punish blasphemers in Leviticus 24:14.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with John 8:7
Jesus challenges those without sin to cast a stone, contrasting the instruction to stone blasphemers in Leviticus 24:14.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse teaches to leave vengeance to God, contradicting the human-implemented punishment in Leviticus 24:14.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with James 1:20
This verse states that human anger does not produce God's righteousness, challenging the prescribed punishment in Leviticus 24:14.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Advises loving enemies and praying for persecutors, conflicting with the call for punishment in Leviticus 24:14.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Paradox #1
Leviticus 24:14 mentions a punishment that involves community participation. A potential theological conflict could be the concept of mercy and forgiveness taught by Jesus in the New Testament, which emphasizes forgiveness over strict adherence to punitive laws. This could create a perceived inconsistency between the Old and New Testament teachings.
Paradox #2
The possible doctrinal conflict with Leviticus 24:14 could relate to the difference between the Old and New Testament teachings on punishment and forgiveness. In the Old Testament, laws often focused on strict, immediate justice, while the New Testament emphasizes mercy and forgiveness through Jesus' teachings. This shift could create tension between adhering to older laws and following the new message of compassion and forgiveness.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency with Leviticus 24:14 might relate to the broader context of contrasting messages in the Bible regarding punishment and forgiveness. While this verse talks about a severe punishment, other parts of the Bible emphasize forgiveness and mercy, leading to debates about interpreting laws versus compassion. Additionally, historical changes in social norms and legal systems make such ancient laws seem inconsistent with modern views on justice.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or inconsistency in Leviticus 24:14 could be related to how justice and punishment are viewed. The verse describes a form of capital punishment that modern science and ethics might question or find problematic. Today, evidence-based and humane approaches to justice often conflict with ancient practices that involve physical punishment. This reflects a moral and ethical disagreement rather than a direct contradiction.
Paradox #5
Leviticus 24:14 involves enforcing a severe punishment. The moral conflict arises from the tension between justice and mercy. Some people see the punishment as too harsh or unkind, clashing with values of forgiveness and compassion. Others argue it's about maintaining order and respect. This inconsistency can create debates about how justice should be applied fairly and humanely.