Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises turning the other cheek instead of seeking retribution, contrasting the "eye for an eye" principle in Leviticus 24:19.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
This verse teaches not to repay evil for evil, suggesting a departure from the retributive justice seen in Leviticus 24:19.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
This verse encourages waiting for the Lord's deliverance rather than taking personal vengeance, opposing the direct retribution of Leviticus 24:19.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Advises blessing instead of retaliating with evil, which contradicts the reciprocal punishment approach in Leviticus 24:19.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
This verse suggests offering the other cheek, highlighting forgiveness over revenge, contrary to the principle in Leviticus 24:19.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Paradox #1
Some might see a contradiction between the principle in Leviticus 24:19, which involves retribution, and the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament, especially when He emphasizes forgiveness and turning the other cheek. This can be seen as inconsistent with the idea of direct retribution or "an eye for an eye."
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Leviticus 24:19 could relate to the idea of "an eye for an eye" or retributive justice, which some might see as conflicting with teachings about forgiveness and turning the other cheek, as found in the New Testament, particularly in the teachings of Jesus. This could create tension between upholding justice and showing mercy or forgiveness.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 24:19 deals with the principle of "an eye for an eye," which could conflict with teachings in the New Testament. Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount, encourages turning the other cheek instead of seeking revenge. This can be seen as a contradiction between Old Testament law and New Testament teachings on forgiveness and mercy.
Paradox #4
This verse discusses the principle of "an eye for an eye," which means that the punishment for an injury should be equal to the injury itself. A scientific inconsistency might be that this principle does not consider the complexities of human behavior, psychology, and societal impact. Science often focuses on rehabilitation and understanding underlying causes rather than just retribution.
Paradox #5
The moral conflict in this verse can be seen when comparing the "eye for an eye" approach to morality, which suggests retaliation, with other teachings in the Bible that encourage forgiveness and turning the other cheek, like those found in the New Testament. This can present an inconsistency in the messages about how to deal with wrongdoing.