Contradiction with Matthew 12:8
Jesus claims authority over the Sabbath, suggesting a shift from strict Old Testament Sabbath laws.
Matthew 12:8: For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.
Contradiction with Mark 2:27
The Sabbath is made for man, not man for the Sabbath, indicating flexibility rather than strict adherence.
Mark 2:27: And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Paul emphasizes not letting anyone judge in matters of Sabbath, pointing towards freedom from Old Testament legalism.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Romans 14:5
Each person should be convinced in their own mind about sacred days, allowing individual interpretation over uniform observance.
Romans 14:5: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with Galatians 4:10-11
Paul warns against returning to strict observance of special days, potentially including Sabbath years.
Galatians 4:10-11: Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:12
With the priesthood change, there's a change in the law, suggesting potential shifts in observance practices.
Hebrews 7:12: For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 25:12 discusses the sabbatical year and highlights the principle of resting the land and not harvesting its produce for profit. A potential moral conflict might arise when considering the economic needs of individuals who rely on farming for survival. While the verse supports rest and trust in divine provision, it could be seen as inconsistent with the immediate needs of those who depend on continuous work and productivity to support their families and communities. This could create tension between following religious commands and meeting practical, everyday needs.