Contradiction with Psalm 115:16
This verse states that the earth has been given to humans, which contradicts Leviticus 25:23 where the land is said to belong to God.
Psalm 115:16: The heaven, [even] the heavens, [are] the LORD'S: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.
Contradiction with Genesis 1:28
This verse grants humanity dominion over the earth, which contrasts with the idea in Leviticus 25:23 that the land is God's.
Genesis 1:28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. [moveth: Heb. creepeth]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 11:8-9
These verses imply permanent possession of the land by Israel, conflicting with the notion in Leviticus 25:23 that the land is not to be permanently sold because it belongs to God.
Deuteronomy 11:8-9: Therefore shall ye keep all the commandments which I command you this day, that ye may be strong, and go in and possess the land, whither ye go to possess it;
Contradiction with Isaiah 57:13
This verse suggests that possessing the land is conditional on seeking God, whereas Leviticus 25:23 declares the land inherently belongs to God regardless.
Isaiah 57:13: When thou criest, let thy companies deliver thee; but the wind shall carry them all away; vanity shall take [them]: but he that putteth his trust in me shall possess the land, and shall inherit my holy mountain;
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction with Leviticus 25:23 could be the idea of land ownership. In many societies, owning land is a symbol of wealth and stability, yet the verse suggests that humans are not the true owners of the land, as the land belongs to God. This could conflict with the belief that humans have the right to fully own and control their own property.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Leviticus 25:23 could be the idea that land cannot be permanently owned by individuals since it belongs to God, which may conflict with other biblical teachings or modern cultural practices that support personal property ownership and wealth accumulation. This may lead to discussions about how property rights are viewed and whether they should reflect divine ownership as presented in this verse.
Paradox #3
The contradiction, inconsistency, or conflict with that verse could relate to the idea of land ownership. In ancient contexts, this verse suggests that land should not be sold permanently, as it actually belongs to a higher authority. This might conflict with historical practices where permanent land ownership and sales were commonplace and considered essential for economic transactions and stability.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict in Leviticus 25:23 could stem from the idea of land ownership. It suggests that the land ultimately belongs to a higher power, not to people permanently. This may contradict the common practice of private property ownership and the belief in human autonomy over land and resources, leading to a clash between spiritual beliefs and societal norms about ownership rights.