Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:7-8
These verses encourage open-handed generosity to the poor, contrasting with a focus on redemption of property in Leviticus 25:25.
Deuteronomy 15:7-8: If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother:
Contradiction with Matthew 6:19-20
These verses advise against storing up earthly treasures, which contrasts with the redemption of land as a form of wealth in Leviticus 25:25.
Matthew 6:19-20: Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
Contradiction with Acts 4:32
This verse describes the believers having all possessions in common, contradicting the individual redemption of property in Leviticus 25:25.
Acts 4:32: And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any [of them] that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Contradiction with Luke 6:30
This verse emphasizes giving to those who ask, which contrasts with redeeming for oneself as mentioned in Leviticus 25:25.
Luke 6:30: Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask [them] not again.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:21
Jesus advises selling possessions and giving to the poor, which contrasts with the redemption of property for oneself in Leviticus 25:25.
Matthew 19:21: Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go [and] sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come [and] follow me.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 25:25 talks about redeeming land for a family member who has sold it. A potential theological conflict could arise when comparing this idea with the New Testament teaching that emphasizes spiritual kinship over biological family ties, suggesting a shift from physical to spiritual priorities. This could be seen as conflicting because the Old Testament suggests caring for family in material terms, while the New Testament often emphasizes spiritual bonds and community over individual familial responsibilities.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 25:25 talks about the idea of helping family members who are in financial trouble. A contradiction might be seen in how this verse focuses on helping family within a close community, while other biblical teachings emphasize helping everyone, not just family. This could seem inconsistent to some because one part of the Bible stresses community help, while other parts stress universal help.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 25:25 talks about the redemption of property, where a family member can buy back land that a relative had to sell. The moral conflict could arise when considering modern views on wealth distribution and social justice. This concept suggests a system where family wealth can be protected and restored, potentially contradicting ideas about equal opportunity and the changing nature of wealth in society. It assumes a family-based safety net, which might not apply or be fair in contemporary contexts where family support is not equally available to everyone.