Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:1-2
These verses talk about the cancellation of debts every seven years, which contrasts with the perpetual property rights discussed in Leviticus 25:29.
Deuteronomy 15:1-2: At the end of [every] seven years thou shalt make a release.
Contradiction with Leviticus 25:10
This verse mentions the Jubilee year as a time when freedom and land restitution are proclaimed, conflicting with the permanent sale described in Leviticus 25:29.
Leviticus 25:10: And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout [all] the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 46:18
It prohibits rulers from permanently dispossessing people of their land, opposing the ability to sell urban properties without redemption indicated in Leviticus 25:29.
Ezekiel 46:18: Moreover the prince shall not take of the people's inheritance by oppression, to thrust them out of their possession; [but] he shall give his sons inheritance out of his own possession: that my people be not scattered every man from his possession.
Contradiction with Isaiah 5:8
Warns against accumulating many houses and fields, contradicting the practice of permanent urban property acquisition implied in Leviticus 25:29.
Isaiah 5:8: Woe unto them that join house to house, [that] lay field to field, till [there be] no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth! [they: Heb. ye]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 32:15
Promises that fields, houses, and vineyards shall again be possessed in the land, suggesting a temporary nature of such transactions differing from Leviticus 25:29.
Jeremiah 32:15: For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Houses and fields and vineyards shall be possessed again in this land.
Paradox #1
This verse may present a moral inconsistency because it allows buying and selling houses in walled cities, which could promote inequality and undermine family stability. It might conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize caring for and supporting the less fortunate.