Contradiction with Matthew 12:1-2
This verse tells the story of Jesus' disciples plucking grain on the Sabbath. The Pharisees considered it unlawful, which implies that religious practices like resting or working on certain days can be questioned, contradicting the strict agricultural cycle in Leviticus 25:3.
Matthew 12:1-2: At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn, and to eat.
Contradiction with Luke 6:1-5
Jesus defends his disciples for plucking grain on the Sabbath, suggesting that human need can override strict observance of law, contradicting the rigid adherence to agricultural rest in Leviticus 25:3.
Luke 6:1-5: And it came to pass on the second sabbath after the first, that he went through the corn fields; and his disciples plucked the ears of corn, and did eat, rubbing [them] in [their] hands.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
This verse suggests that Christians should not be judged on matters of religious observance such as Sabbath days, which can contradict the strict observance of agricultural Sabbaths in Leviticus 25:3.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Romans 14:5-6
Paul here is saying that each person should be convinced in their own mind about the importance of observing certain days, which could contradict the mandated observance in Leviticus 25:3.
Romans 14:5-6: One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day [alike]. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. [fully persuaded: or, fully assured]
Contradiction with Galatians 4:9-10
Paul rebukes the Galatians for observing special days/months/seasons. This verse can be seen as contradicting the mandated agricultural cycles in Leviticus 25:3.
Galatians 4:9-10: But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? [turn ye again: or, turn ye back] [elements: or, rudiments]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Leviticus 25:3 may arise when considering modern values and ethics, particularly around land use and environmental stewardship. The verse discusses land use in a way that could be seen as prioritizing human economic activities over ecological balance, which conflicts with contemporary views that emphasize sustainable practices and environmental protection. Additionally, this agricultural directive might seem at odds with current understandings of fair land use and distribution, possibly conflicting with ideas of social justice and equality.