Contradiction with 2 Thessalonians 3:10
This verse instructs that if any would not work, neither should he eat, which contrasts with the idea of supporting and maintaining a brother who falls into poverty.
2 Thessalonians 3:10: For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:4
The soul of the sluggard desires and has nothing, suggesting that laziness results in lack, which can contrast with the unconditional support recommended in Leviticus 25:35.
Proverbs 13:4: The soul of the sluggard desireth, and [hath] nothing: but the soul of the diligent shall be made fat.
Contradiction with Matthew 25:29
This verse suggests that those who have will be given more, and those who do not have will lose even what they have, which opposes the supportive approach toward the poor.
Matthew 25:29: For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:8
States that one must provide for their own family, implying a primary duty to one's immediate family, potentially conflicting with the extended obligation toward others in need.
1 Timothy 5:8: But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. [house: or, kindred]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in this verse could relate to the broader biblical laws and practices regarding lending, debt, and slavery. Leviticus 25:35 promotes the idea of supporting those in need. However, elsewhere in the Bible, there are verses that seem to allow or regulate practices like slavery or charging interest, which can be seen as inconsistent with the idea of providing unconditional support to everyone. These differences in social and economic guidance might appear conflicting to some readers.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict might arise because the Bible emphasizes helping and supporting those in need, but other parts of the text contain rules or narratives that seem harsh or discriminatory, like those regarding slavery or treatment of certain groups. This might feel inconsistent with the call to kindness and support.