Contradiction with Exodus 21:16
This verse condemns the act of kidnapping and selling a person, contrasting with the ownership of people implied in Leviticus 25:46.
Exodus 21:16: And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes equality in Christ, contradicting the permission to own others as property in Leviticus 25:46.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse promotes treating others as you would like to be treated, contradicting the idea of owning others found in Leviticus 25:46.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Exodus 21:2
This verse indicates the release of Hebrew servants after six years, contradicting the permanent ownership of slaves suggested in Leviticus 25:46.
Exodus 21:2: If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:12
This verse mandates the release of Hebrew servants after six years, in contrast to the perpetual servitude allowed in Leviticus 25:46.
Deuteronomy 15:12: [And] if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.
Paradox #1
The verse could be seen as contradicting the broader biblical themes of love, equality, and the inherent dignity of all people. It might seem inconsistent with teachings that emphasize treating others as one wishes to be treated and the idea that all humans are made in the image of God.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 25:46 might be seen as conflicting with broader biblical themes of love, equality, and justice. This verse speaks about owning slaves, which seems at odds with the idea of all people being created in God's image and the New Testament teachings of loving your neighbor and treating others with compassion. Some view this as inconsistent with the Bible's message of inherent human dignity and the call to love and treat others fairly.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 25:46 could be seen as inconsistent with many modern views on human rights, as it allows for the ownership and passing down of people as property. This contradicts contemporary values that emphasize equality and the inherent dignity of all individuals, opposing any form of slavery or human ownership.
Paradox #4
The verse could potentially conflict with modern views on human rights and equality, as it touches on the ownership and treatment of people, which contradicts contemporary ethical standards that advocate for the inherent dignity and freedom of every individual.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in this verse could lie in the allowance of owning people as property, which conflicts with current views on human rights and equality. It suggests a practice that is seen today as morally wrong and unjust, showing inconsistency with the idea that all people should be treated equally and with dignity.