Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus claims to fulfill the law, implying a new covenant, while Leviticus 26:46 emphasizes the ongoing significance of commandments given to Israel.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
States that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness, suggesting a contrast with the perpetual statutes noted in Leviticus 26:46.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Indicates that the old covenant is obsolete, conflicting with the enduring nature of the statutes in Leviticus 26:46.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Suggests the law was a temporary guardian until Christ, which seems to contradict the permanence of the commandments in Leviticus.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 3:14
Refers to the old covenant as having a veil, contrasting with the clarity and authority of the statutes commanded in Leviticus 26:46.
2 Corinthians 3:14: But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which [vail] is done away in Christ.