Contradiction with Numbers 30:2
This verse emphasizes the importance of fulfilling vows without changing them, contrasting with Leviticus 27:10's allowance for substitution.
Numbers 30:2: If a man vow a vow unto the LORD, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth. [break: Heb. profane]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:37
This verse promotes straightforwardness without alteration, conflicting with Leviticus 27:10's provisions for exchange.
Matthew 5:37: But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 27:10 may conflict with the idea of God's unchanging nature. The verse discusses not changing something that is vowed to God, which might be seen as inconsistent with instances in the Bible where God allows changes or revisions to commitments. This could raise questions about the balance between following strict rules and the possibility of divine flexibility.
Paradox #2
This verse can be seen as inconsistent when compared to other parts of the Bible that emphasize keeping vows and promises. Some might find it contradictory to allow substitutions or exchanges in a vowed offering when other parts of the Bible stress the importance of fulfilling vows exactly as promised.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Leviticus 27:10 could be seen in terms of fairness and keeping promises. It discusses not changing or substituting animals once they are promised to God. The potential conflict may arise if someone realizes they made a mistake or circumstances change, yet the rule doesn't allow for flexibility or mercy in altering the promise, which might seem harsh or unfair.