Contradiction with Leviticus 25:23
States that the land shall not be sold permanently because it belongs to God, whereas Leviticus 27:28 suggests that items or persons devoted to the Lord cannot be sold or redeemed.
Leviticus 25:23: The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land [is] mine; for ye [are] strangers and sojourners with me. [for ever: or, to be quite cut off: Heb. for cutting off]
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
Declares that what God has cleansed is no longer unclean, contradicting the permanence of devotion as unchangeable and non-redeemable in Leviticus 27:28.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:9
Implies that the old law is set aside to establish the new covenant, in contrast to Leviticus 27:28 which emphasizes an unchangeable devotion under the old law.
Hebrews 10:9: Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
States nothing is unclean in itself except to him who considers it unclean, opposing the notion that devoted things are irrevocably sacred as in Leviticus 27:28.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus mentions fulfilling the law, suggesting a transformation or completion, as opposed to the static permanence described in Leviticus 27:28.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
Speaks of the law's requirements being nailed to the cross, which could argue against the eternal nature of devoted items described in Leviticus 27:28.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Contradiction with Galatians 3:13
States that Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, which undermines the non-redeemable aspect of devotion in Leviticus 27:28.
Galatians 3:13: Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree:
Paradox #1
Leviticus 27:28 presents the idea that certain things dedicated to God cannot be sold or redeemed, implying they are permanently belonging to Him. A potential theological conflict arises when considering other parts of the Bible that emphasize God's mercy and redemption. In those instances, God's willingness to restore and redeem what is lost or dedicated could seem inconsistent with the idea of something being irredeemably dedicated. This could create a tension between God's justice and mercy.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 27:28 could conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize God's forgiveness and mercy. This verse discusses irrevocable dedication to God, yet other parts of the Bible highlight redemption and forgiveness, suggesting a possible inconsistency in understanding how absolute such dedications must be.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 27:28 could be seen as inconsistent with later biblical texts or religious practices. This verse talks about items dedicated to God being non-redeemable, which may conflict with the concept of redemption or forgiveness found in later teachings. Additionally, it could conflict with other passages that describe different rules about offerings to God, creating contradictory guidelines.
Paradox #4
One possible contradiction in this verse could be the idea of dedicating something to God in a way that it becomes irredeemable or permanently set apart, which might conflict with the broader biblical themes of redemption and forgiveness. This could raise questions about the nature of dedication and whether it contradicts the possibility of change or redemption.