Contradiction with Deuteronomy 14:22-26
Contradicts by allowing tithes to be consumed by the tither in a specified location rather than solely given to the Lord.
Deuteronomy 14:22-26: Thou shalt truly tithe all the increase of thy seed, that the field bringeth forth year by year.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:23
Suggests that justice, mercy, and faith are weightier matters than the tithe itself, potentially downplaying the emphasis on tithing seen in Leviticus.
Matthew 23:23: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. [anise: Gr. dill]
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 9:7
Emphasizes giving what one decides in their heart rather than a fixed tithe, conflicting with Leviticus' requirement of a tenth.
2 Corinthians 9:7: Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, [so let him give]; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:18-19
Notes the setting aside of previous commandments, hinting that the Levitical tithe may no longer be relevant.
Hebrews 7:18-19: For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 27:30 discusses tithing a portion of one's produce to God. A possible contradiction or inconsistency could be seen in the New Testament, where the emphasis shifts from strict adherence to Old Testament laws to faith and grace through Jesus Christ. Some argue this shift suggests a change in how religious obligations like tithing are viewed, potentially causing confusion about whether it is a requirement for Christians.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise from how tithing is practiced differently across various religious groups today compared to the ancient context in which it was written. In ancient times, tithing was largely agricultural, involving crops and livestock. In contrast, modern interpretations often focus on monetary contributions, which may not align with the original setting and purpose described in the historical text.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or conflict in this verse could be related to the idea of mandating tithing as a religious obligation. Some may argue that compulsory giving contradicts the concept of freewill offering, where generosity should come from personal choice rather than obligation. Additionally, there might be a conflict if someone feels they are unable to meet this requirement due to financial hardship, which could create tension between religious duties and personal well-being.