Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts the prohibition of eating certain fats mandated in Leviticus 3:17.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states that no food is unclean in itself, conflicting with the dietary restrictions set forth in Leviticus 3:17.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4-5
Paul remarks that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving, implying a contradiction with the specific food laws mentioned in Leviticus 3:17.
1 Timothy 4:4-5: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Paradox #1
Certain dietary laws in Leviticus, including the prohibition on eating fat and blood, may seem inconsistent with the New Testament teachings that suggest that Christians are no longer bound by Old Testament dietary restrictions. This can create a conflict for some readers between the Old Law given to the Israelites and the new covenant established through Jesus.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 3:17 talks about rules for what not to eat. Some might see a conflict because other parts of the Bible later suggest different dietary rules. For example, in the New Testament, some restrictions are relaxed, which might seem inconsistent with earlier commands.
Paradox #3
Some people might see a contradiction between this instruction and scientific knowledge about nutrition. Science shows that animal fat is an important source of energy and nutrients for many people, and moderate consumption may have health benefits. Therefore, some might find it inconsistent with scientific understanding of how the body uses fat.
Paradox #4
Leviticus 3:17 advises against eating certain animal fats and blood. A potential contradiction comes when considering other parts of the Bible where dietary rules change or are not emphasized, such as in the New Testament, which suggests that dietary laws don't necessarily determine righteousness. This could be seen as inconsistent or conflicting advice about what is considered moral eating behavior.