Contradictions and Paradoxes in Leviticus 5:10

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Leviticus 5:10 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Leviticus 5:10. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, the person must give another animal to be burned as a gift to God, and then the priest will help make things right with God for any wrongs done, so God will forgive them. This is how people could say sorry to God a long time ago.

Leviticus 5:10: And he shall offer the second [for] a burnt offering, according to the manner: and the priest shall make an atonement for him for his sin which he hath sinned, and it shall be forgiven him. [manner: or, ordinance]

Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4

Explains that it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins, contrasting with Leviticus 5:10, which details a sin offering system for atonement.

Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

Contradiction with Hebrews 9:12

States that Jesus entered the holy place with His own blood for eternal redemption, suggesting that animal sacrifices as described in Leviticus 5:10 are no longer necessary.

Hebrews 9:12: Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption [for us].

Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11

God questions the value of sacrifices, implying that offerings like those in Leviticus 5:10 are not what He desires.

Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]

Contradiction with Matthew 9:13

Jesus emphasizes mercy over sacrifice, suggesting a shift away from the sacrificial system described in Leviticus 5:10.

Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Contradiction with Psalm 51:16-17

Indicates that God does not delight in sacrifices or burnt offerings, which challenges the effectiveness or necessity of such rituals as described in Leviticus 5:10.

Psalm 51:16-17: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]

Contradiction with Amos 5:22

God expresses rejection of burnt offerings and peace offerings, which include the type referred to in Leviticus 5:10.

Amos 5:22: Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept [them]: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts. [peace...: or, thank offerings]

Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:22-23

Implies God did not primarily command sacrifices but obedience, contrasting the prescribed rituals in Leviticus 5:10.

Jeremiah 7:22-23: For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices: [concerning: Heb. concerning the matter of]

Paradox #1

The verse involves offerings for atonement and forgiveness. A contradiction could arise for some people who believe that forgiveness and moral reconciliation should not require a ritual or sacrifice, conflicting with the idea of achieving forgiveness through spiritual or personal reflection alone.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.