Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
Explains that it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins, whereas Leviticus 5:11 permits a fine flour offering for sin atonement.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
Suggests that the law can never make those who draw near perfect, in contrast to Leviticus 5:11 which offers atonement through flour.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Psalm 51:16
States that God does not delight in sacrifice, opposing the notion in Leviticus 5:11 of offering for atonement.
Psalm 51:16: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:22
Asserts that without the shedding of blood, there is no remission, conflicting with Leviticus 5:11's allowance for a non-blood offering.
Hebrews 9:22: And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.