Contradiction with James 4:17
This verse states that knowing to do good and not doing it is a sin, emphasizing conscious awareness, whereas Leviticus 5:17 suggests unintentional sins need atonement.
James 4:17: Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin.
Contradiction with Romans 5:13
This verse mentions that sin is not imputed when there is no law, while Leviticus 5:17 implies accountability even when unaware of the law.
Romans 5:13: (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Contradiction with Acts 17:30
This verse speaks of God overlooking times of ignorance, contrasted with the strictness of atonement for unknown sins in Leviticus 5:17.
Acts 17:30: And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Contradiction with 1 John 3:4
Defines sin as lawlessness, focusing on deliberate actions, which contrasts with Leviticus 5:17 addressing unintentional offenses.
1 John 3:4: Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Paradox #1
There might be a perceived theological inconsistency regarding accountability for unknown sins. Some might wonder how a person can be responsible for sins they are unaware of, creating a tension with the idea of justice and forgiveness. This can lead to questions about fairness and the nature of sin.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 5:17 might show a contradiction because it implies someone can be guilty of sin even if they were unaware they did something wrong. This raises questions about fairness and justice, as it suggests people can be held accountable for actions they didn't consciously choose or know were wrong.