Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:25
This verse suggests eating anything sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience, which contradicts the prohibition in Leviticus 7:27 on consuming blood.
1 Corinthians 10:25: Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, [that] eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
It states that nothing is unclean in itself, contrasting with Leviticus 7:27's ban on eating blood.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts the dietary restriction found in Leviticus 7:27 regarding blood consumption.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
Peter is told to eat all kinds of animals, as nothing God has made is unclean, which contradicts the specific prohibition in Leviticus 7:27.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 7:27 states that any person who eats blood will be cut off from their people. A potential contradiction or inconsistency could arise from the practice of eating blood in some cultures, both ancient and modern, without any apparent divine punishment or social exclusion, suggesting that this rule was not universally applied or enforced.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could arise from the strict dietary laws it enforces, which might clash with the belief in personal freedom or differing cultural practices. Imposing such strict regulations on consumption may seem inconsistent with the broader message of love and acceptance.