Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
This verse suggests that the law is only a shadow of good things to come, implying a transitory nature, whereas Leviticus 7:37 describes statutes that seem enduring and permanent.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Here, Jesus states He did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it, suggesting completion and perhaps a shift away from the specific ceremonial laws like those in Leviticus 7:37.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts dietary statutes in Leviticus, indicating a change in the understanding and application of these laws.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Acts 15:28-29
The early Church decides not to impose the full Mosaic Law on Gentile believers, a decision that overlooks many laws detailed in Leviticus.
Acts 15:28-29: For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
This passage indicates that the law was a guardian until Christ came, suggesting that the specific laws of Leviticus, such as those in 7:37, are no longer necessary as a guide for Christians.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.