Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
By calling this covenant "new," it implies that the old covenant (including the laws in Leviticus) is obsolete and outdated, suggesting a contradiction in relevance.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
Describes the law as having only a shadow of good things to come, implying that it is not the reality itself, which can contradict the notion of permanence in the rules stated in Leviticus.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
God declares that what He has cleansed should not be called unclean, contradicting the specific sacrificial and cleanliness laws in Leviticus.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
States Christians are not under the law but under grace, contradicting the adherence to sacrificial laws as outlined in Leviticus.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Indicates that the law was our guardian until Christ, suggesting that the specific laws in Leviticus are no longer applicable for justification.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
Speaks of the laws being nailed to the cross, implying that they are no longer in effect, which contradicts the need to follow them strictly as in Leviticus.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;