Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Leviticus 9:12 describes the continuation of sacrificial rituals, while Matthew 5:17 emphasizes Jesus fulfilling the law rather than abolishing it, implying a shift from these traditional practices.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:9-10
Leviticus 9:12 describes burnt offerings, yet Hebrews 10:9-10 suggests that through Christ's sacrifice, the need for such offerings is nullified.
Hebrews 10:9-10: Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:22-23
Leviticus 9:12 involves burnt offerings, whereas Jeremiah 7:22-23 claims God did not originally command burnt offerings but rather obedience.
Jeremiah 7:22-23: For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices: [concerning: Heb. concerning the matter of]
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
Leviticus 9:12 details sacrificial rituals, in contrast to Hosea 6:6, which emphasizes mercy and knowledge of God over burnt offerings.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Contradiction with Psalm 51:16-17
Leviticus 9:12 is about ritual sacrifice, but Psalm 51:16-17 prioritizes a contrite heart over burnt offerings.
Psalm 51:16-17: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]