Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse promotes doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, which aligns with the concept of loving and helping others, in contrast to the lawyer's attempt to define limits on who should be considered a 'neighbor' in Luke 10:29.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with James 2:8-9
This verse states that loving your neighbor as yourself fulfills the royal law, and warns against showing favoritism, contradicting the lawyer's attempt to justify himself by questioning who his neighbor is in Luke 10:29.
James 2:8-9: If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
Contradiction with Galatians 5:14
This verse affirms that the entire law is fulfilled in keeping the command to love your neighbor as yourself, opposing the restricted interpretation of 'neighbor' implied in Luke 10:29.
Galatians 5:14: For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Contradiction with John 13:34
Jesus’ command to love one another sets a broad expectation for love without boundaries, contrasting the lawyer's narrow question about who qualifies as a neighbor in Luke 10:29.
John 13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
Contradiction with Romans 13:10
This verse asserts that love does no harm to a neighbor and is the fulfillment of the law, which contrasts with the lawyer's inclination to limit the scope of who should be considered a neighbor.
Romans 13:10: Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.