Contradiction with Matthew 12:12
Jesus teaches that it is lawful to do well on the Sabbath, which contradicts the ruler's interpretation in Luke 13:14.
Matthew 12:12: How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.
Contradiction with Mark 2:27
Jesus states that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath, contrasting the strict observance demanded in Luke 13:14.
Mark 2:27: And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
Contradiction with John 7:23
Jesus questions why healing on the Sabbath should cause anger, opposing the indignation expressed in Luke 13:14.
John 7:23: If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? [that...: or, without breaking the law of Moses]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Paul advises not to let others judge in Sabbath matters, contrasting the ruler's judgmental stance in Luke 13:14.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
The doctrinal conflict with Luke 13:14 could be the strict interpretation of the Sabbath law. In this verse, a synagogue leader is upset that Jesus heals on the Sabbath, highlighting a tension between following religious laws strictly versus doing acts of mercy and kindness. The conflict lies in balancing adherence to religious rules with compassion and good deeds.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in Luke 13:14 could be seen as the tension between strict adherence to religious laws and the need for compassion and kindness. The religious leader emphasizes following rules about the Sabbath, while Jesus highlights the importance of caring for others, even if it means bending those rules. This conflict showcases the challenge of balancing law and empathy.