Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse emphasizes the promise of eternal life through belief in Jesus, whereas Luke 13:28 speaks of weeping and gnashing of teeth as a consequence of being cast out.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Romans 10:13
This verse states that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved, which seems to contradict the idea of exclusion found in Luke 13:28.
Romans 10:13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
This verse speaks of God desiring all men to be saved, in contrast to the depiction of people being thrust out in Luke 13:28.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse highlights God's patience and wish for everyone to come to repentance, contrasting with the finality of judgment depicted in Luke 13:28.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with Revelation 21:4
This verse describes a place without sorrow or pain, conflicting with the image of weeping in Luke 13:28.
Revelation 21:4: And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Paradox #1
Luke 13:28 might seem contradictory to the idea that everyone will be saved and experience happiness in heaven, as the verse speaks of people being left out and experiencing regret and sadness. This could appear inconsistent with the belief in universal salvation, where all souls eventually reach heaven.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in this verse can be the idea of exclusion and suffering. It describes a scenario where some people expect to be included in a good place but find themselves left out, leading to distress. This might seem inconsistent with the broader message of forgiveness and inclusion often associated with love and mercy. It raises questions about fairness and the criteria for inclusion or exclusion.