Contradiction with Matthew 7:19
This verse contradicts Luke 13:8 by stating that every tree that does not bring forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire, whereas Luke 13:8 suggests giving the tree another chance.
Matthew 7:19: Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Contradiction with Matthew 3:10
It indicates that trees not producing good fruit will be cut down without suggesting another chance, contrary to the request for more time in Luke 13:8.
Matthew 3:10: And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Contradiction with John 15:6
This verse implies that branches not bearing fruit are taken away and burned, contradicting the plea for patience and additional care in Luke 13:8.
John 15:6: If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast [them] into the fire, and they are burned.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 11:16
Describes a tree set on fire due to its fruitlessness, contrasting Luke 13:8, where there is a request to give the tree another chance.
Jeremiah 11:16: The LORD called thy name, A green olive tree, fair, [and] of goodly fruit: with the noise of a great tumult he hath kindled fire upon it, and the branches of it are broken.
Contradiction with Hebrews 6:8
Implies that land which does not produce useful vegetation is near to being cursed and burned, unlike the patient and hopeful approach in Luke 13:8.
Hebrews 6:8: But that which beareth thorns and briers [is] rejected, and [is] nigh unto cursing; whose end [is] to be burned.
Paradox #1
Luke 13:8 discusses giving a fruitless tree more time to become productive. A possible contradiction could be the balance between patience and accountability. On one hand, it teaches the value of giving chances and showing patience. On the other hand, it might suggest delaying consequences, potentially enabling unproductive behavior. This tension between mercy and responsibility might seem inconsistent in some interpretations.