Contradiction with James 2:5
Luke 16:19 speaks of a rich man, showing wealth, while James 2:5 highlights God's choice of the poor to be rich in faith.
James 2:5: Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? [of the: or, of that]
Contradiction with Matthew 19:24
Luke 16:19 depicts a wealthy man, whereas Matthew 19:24 suggests the difficulty for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.
Matthew 19:24: And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:10
Luke 16:19 describes a rich man's life, while 1 Timothy 6:10 warns against the love of money being the root of all evil.
1 Timothy 6:10: For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. [erred: or, been seduced]
Contradiction with Proverbs 28:11
Luke 16:19 shows the rich man's perspective, but Proverbs 28:11 suggests the poor who has understanding is wiser.
Proverbs 28:11: The rich man [is] wise in his own conceit; but the poor that hath understanding searcheth him out. [own...: Heb. eyes]
Contradiction with James 5:1-2
Luke 16:19 mentions the rich man's attire, while James 5:1-2 warns the rich of misery awaiting them.
James 5:1-2: Go to now, [ye] rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon [you].
Contradiction with Luke 6:24
Luke 16:19 portrays the rich man's wealth, contrary to Luke 6:24 that gives woe to the rich who have received their consolation.
Luke 6:24: But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in Luke 16:19 can arise from the tension between wealth and compassion. The verse is part of the story contrasting a rich man's life of luxury with that of a poor man named Lazarus. This can bring up questions about the responsibility of the wealthy to help the poor and whether living a life of excess is morally justifiable when others are suffering.