Contradiction with Exodus 23:4-5
These verses instruct on helping one's enemy, showing a different response to those who do not express gratitude.
Exodus 23:4-5: If thou meet thine enemy's ox or his ass going astray, thou shalt surely bring it back to him again.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse teaches to love enemies and pray for those who persecute, rather than questioning ingratitude.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:20
Advises feeding enemies when hungry, rather than expecting thanks or recognition.
Romans 12:20: Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
Encourages kindness to enemies to "heap coals of fire on his head," differing from expecting gratitude.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 6:35
Instructs to lend and do good without hoping for anything in return, contradicting any expectation of thanks.
Luke 6:35: But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and [to] the evil.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
Urges to do good to all, without mention of gratitude requirements.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in this context might be seen in questioning fairness. If gratitude is expected, the story could imply that those who are thankful might receive more favor, which conflicts with the idea of unconditional help or love. However, it's important to recognize this as a perspective on human behavior rather than a moral inconsistency in the teaching itself.