Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3
While Luke 17:26 speaks to the suddenness of events as in the days of Noah, 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 suggests that people say "Peace and safety," then sudden destruction comes, indicating a period of perceived peace rather than the chaotic times of Noah.
1 Thessalonians 5:2-3: For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
Contradiction with Matthew 24:44
Luke 17:26 describes events like the days of Noah implying unexpectedness, but Matthew 24:44 explicitly emphasizes being ready for the unexpected arrival of the Son of Man.
Matthew 24:44: Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:10
While Luke 17:26 talks about normalcy before the sudden flood, 2 Peter 3:10 emphasizes that the day of the Lord will come like a thief, involving divine intervention rather than a natural disaster.
2 Peter 3:10: But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
Contradiction with Amos 3:7
Luke 17:26 illustrates the unawareness of people during Noah's time, whereas Amos 3:7 highlights that God reveals His plans to His prophets, suggesting awareness for some.
Amos 3:7: Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.
Contradiction with Revelation 16:15
Luke 17:26 has no direct call to vigilance besides the narrative of Noah, but Revelation 16:15 directly instructs to stay alert and keep one's clothes on.
Revelation 16:15: Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed [is] he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction could be related to the interpretation of historical and geological events mentioned in the verse. If the verse refers to specific events that are not supported by scientific evidence or timelines, there could be a conflict. For example, if it implies a global event that contradicts the geological or anthropological record, that could be seen as an inconsistency.