Contradiction with Matthew 25:24-25
Both parables involve servants given money by their master, but in Matthew the servant offers an explanation of fear, whereas in Luke, the servant simply implies negligence without expressing fear.
Matthew 25:24-25: Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:24
The diligent hand shall bear rule, contradicting the lazy servant’s behavior in Luke 19:20, which results in a lack of reward.
Proverbs 12:24: The hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute. [slothful: or, deceitful]
Contradiction with Proverbs 18:9
This warns against slothfulness causing destruction, opposing the justification of the servant in Luke 19:20.
Proverbs 18:9: He also that is slothful in his work is brother to him that is a great waster.
Contradiction with James 2:26
Faith without works is dead, which contradicts the servant's lack of action in Luke 19:20.
James 2:26: For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also. [spirit: or, breath]
Contradiction with Colossians 3:23-24
Advises doing work heartily as for the Lord, contradicting the servant’s neglectful behavior in Luke 19:20.
Colossians 3:23-24: And whatsoever ye do, do [it] heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men;
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Luke 19:20 could arise from the perceived unfair treatment of individuals based on their abilities or circumstances. People might find it conflicting that someone who is fearful or cautious could be punished for their lack of action, despite their different starting point or limited resources, compared to others who are more capable or bold. This can seem inconsistent with the idea of fairness or compassion.