Contradiction with Matthew 5:42
This verse suggests giving to those who ask and not withholding, while Luke 19:24 reflects taking away from someone who has little.
Matthew 5:42: Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Contradiction with James 2:5
This verse indicates that God has chosen the poor to be rich in faith, which contrasts with the idea of taking away from the one who has little.
James 2:5: Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? [of the: or, of that]
Contradiction with Proverbs 22:16
This verse implies that oppressing the poor to increase wealth will lead to poverty, contradicting the action of taking from the less fortunate in Luke 19:24.
Proverbs 22:16: He that oppresseth the poor to increase his [riches, and] he that giveth to the rich, [shall] surely [come] to want.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 8:14
Promotes the idea of equality and sharing what one has, as opposed to redistributing from the one who has less as in Luke 19:24.
2 Corinthians 8:14: But by an equality, [that] now at this time your abundance [may be a supply] for their want, that their abundance also may be [a supply] for your want: that there may be equality:
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:17
This verse states that lending to the poor is lending to the Lord, unlike the act of taking from the poor servant in Luke 19:24.
Proverbs 19:17: He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the LORD; and that which he hath given will he pay him again. [that which...: or, his deed]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the context of fairness and distribution of wealth. It might seem unfair to some that a person who has little loses what they have, while someone who already has more receives even more. This can appear to conflict with the values of kindness and fairness.