Contradiction with Jeremiah 33:17
This verse states that David will never lack a man to sit on the throne of Israel, suggesting a perpetual earthly line, whereas Luke 1:33 implies an eternal heavenly kingdom through Jesus.
Jeremiah 33:17: For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel; [David...: Heb. There shall not be cut off from David]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:24
This verse mentions the end, when Jesus will hand over the kingdom to God the Father, which contrasts with the eternal reign mentioned in Luke 1:33.
1 Corinthians 15:24: Then [cometh] the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
Contradiction with Hebrews 1:8
Although this verse speaks of the Son's eternal throne, it implies a shared authority with the Father, contradicting the sole dominion in Luke 1:33.
Hebrews 1:8: But unto the Son [he saith], Thy throne, O God, [is] for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness [is] the sceptre of thy kingdom. [righteousness: Gr. rightness, or, straightness]
Contradiction with Revelation 11:15
This verse proclaims the kingdoms of the world becoming the kingdom of God and His Christ, suggesting a future transition inconsistent with the already-established eternal reign in Luke 1:33.
Revelation 11:15: And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become [the kingdoms] of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Jesus claims His kingdom is not of this world, indicating a spiritual reign, which can be seen as contradicting the notion of a literal everlasting kingdom described in Luke 1:33.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Paradox #1
Some people might see an inconsistency between the idea of an everlasting reign as mentioned in the verse and the belief that the world will one day have an end-time or final judgment. This could seem contradictory if one expects a different kind of conclusion to human history according to other biblical teachings. However, interpretations vary, and for many, this does not pose a contradiction.
Paradox #2
Some may see a contradiction between the idea of an everlasting kingdom mentioned there and the observable changes and challenges faced by earthly kingdoms and human institutions. However, many believe this verse refers to a spiritual or divine realm, which could resolve the perceived conflict.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction is that the verse suggests an everlasting kingdom, but historically, the kingdom of Israel faced many challenges and did not endure without interruption. Critics might see this as inconsistent with the promise described in the verse.