Contradiction with Deuteronomy 18:21-22
Luke 1:35 claims divine conception but these verses suggest questioning prophetic truth without clear signs.
Deuteronomy 18:21-22: And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
Luke 1:35 speaks of God's involvement in human affairs, whereas this verse insists God does not act like humans, suggesting inconsistency.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Job 25:4
Luke 1:35 implies sinless birth, while this verse questions the purity of anyone born to a woman.
Job 25:4: How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean [that is] born of a woman?
Contradiction with John 1:18
While Luke 1:35 discusses a divine conception, this verse states that no one has seen God, creating a tension in divine revelation.
John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].
Contradiction with Acts 17:29
Luke 1:35 indicates a divine nature in humanity, yet this verse argues against perceiving the divine in human forms.
Acts 17:29: Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction in the idea of a miraculous conception without a human father, which may seem inconsistent with the natural order as understood scientifically. Additionally, there can be theological discussions around how this event fits into the nature of Jesus being both fully human and fully divine. Some might find this dual nature challenging to reconcile.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction with the concept of the virgin birth and the idea of Jesus having a human father, as mentioned in other parts of the New Testament. The belief that Jesus is both fully divine and fully human can also be hard to understand, as it seems to mix two different natures. However, many believe both ideas can exist together without conflict.
Paradox #3
One possible area of conflict for Luke 1:35 could be the differing accounts of Jesus's birth and conception in the Gospels of the New Testament. This verse describes the divine conception of Jesus, yet different gospels offer varying details and genealogies, leading to questions about consistency in the nativity narratives.
Paradox #4
The scientific inconsistency with the event described is that it involves a virgin birth, which contradicts the biological understanding of human reproduction that requires both a male and female gamete. Science currently does not support the possibility of a human virgin birth without some form of outside intervention or technology.
Paradox #5
A potential contradiction in this verse could relate to questions about the nature of divine intervention and consent. Some might see a conflict in how divine actions affect human lives and the issue of free will, especially concerning personal autonomy. This can lead to discussions on how divine plans align with human choice and understanding.