Contradiction with John 11:25
Jesus declares Himself as the resurrection and life, implying the reality of resurrection which the Sadducees deny.
John 11:25: Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:12-13
Discusses the resurrection of the dead, countering the Sadducees' disbelief.
1 Corinthians 15:12-13: Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
Contradiction with Acts 23:6-8
Paul acknowledges the belief in resurrection, highlighting the division between Pharisees, who believe, and Sadducees, who do not.
Acts 23:6-8: But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men [and] brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:31-32
Jesus refers to God as the God of the living, not the dead, supporting the concept of resurrection against Sadducean views.
Matthew 22:31-32: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
Contradiction with Daniel 12:2
Speaks of many awakening to everlasting life, a clear affirmation of resurrection contrary to Sadducean beliefs.
Daniel 12:2: And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame [and] everlasting contempt.
Paradox #1
Luke 20:27 involves the Sadducees, who did not believe in the resurrection, questioning Jesus. A perceived contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing the Sadducees' disbelief in the afterlife with other parts of the Bible that affirm the resurrection and the afterlife. This could seem conflicting since the same religious texts appear to endorse differing views on life after death.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this context could be that some groups believe in the resurrection of the dead, while others, like the Sadducees mentioned in this passage, do not. This difference in belief about the afterlife creates a theological inconsistency between various interpretations and teachings within the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Luke 20:27 involves the Sadducees, a Jewish sect that did not believe in the resurrection. They question Jesus about the resurrection, which is inconsistent because other groups, like the Pharisees, did believe in it. This highlights differing beliefs within Jewish groups at the time.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the fact that the Sadducees, who do not believe in resurrection, are questioning Jesus about it. This might seem inconsistent because they are discussing a concept they fundamentally deny, raising questions about the sincerity and purpose of their inquiry.