Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse emphasizes individual responsibility for sin, contradicting the notion of predetermined events suggested in Luke 22:22.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with James 1:13
This verse states that God does not tempt anyone, contradicting the idea of divine predestination in Luke 22:22.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 30:19
This verse presents a choice between life and death, suggesting free will, which contrasts with the predetermined outcome in Luke 22:22.
Deuteronomy 30:19: I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, [that] I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse mentions that God is patient and wants everyone to repent, contradicting the notion of inevitable betrayal in Luke 22:22.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse implies universal opportunity for salvation, which conflicts with the predetermined betrayal in Luke 22:22.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
This verse expresses that humans plan their course, suggesting free will, which is contrary to the idea of predestination in Luke 22:22.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Paradox #1
Luke 22:22 can raise questions about the conflict between divine foreknowledge and human free will. It suggests that Jesus' betrayal was predestined, which could imply that Judas had no choice in his actions. This creates tension between the idea that God has a plan and that humans have the freedom to make their own decisions, leading to discussions about the nature of free will and accountability.
Paradox #2
Luke 22:22 presents a potential contradiction or conflict regarding the concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will. The verse implies that what happens is part of a divine plan, which raises questions about how human actions (like betrayal) can be judged or blamed if they are already predetermined by that plan. This creates a tension between the idea of events being predestined and the moral responsibility of the individuals involved in those events.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict could be that while the verse suggests something is predetermined, it also seems to hold someone responsible for their actions. This raises questions about free will and accountability if events are already decided.