Contradiction with Matthew 10:9-10
While Luke 22:35 reflects Jesus reminding his disciples that they were provided for without money or provisions, Matthew 10:9-10 conveys a similar message but highlights Jesus' instructions not to take money, shoes, or extra supplies for their journey, which may seem contradictory in approach.
Matthew 10:9-10: Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, [Provide: or, Get]
Contradiction with Luke 22:36
In contrast to Luke 22:35, where Jesus emphasizes having lacked nothing, Luke 22:36 instructs the disciples to now take a purse, bag, and even sell their cloak to buy a sword, suggesting a shift in expectations regarding provision and preparedness.
Luke 22:36: Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take [it], and likewise [his] scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction between Luke 22:35 and other parts of the Bible because earlier in the Gospels, Jesus sends his disciples out with instructions not to take basic supplies, saying they will be provided for. However, in this verse, he tells them to prepare and bring provisions. This could seem inconsistent with the earlier message of relying entirely on God's provision.
Paradox #2
Luke 22:35 might seem at odds with other teachings about relying on God and being prepared, as it reflects a time when Jesus tells his disciples they lacked nothing even when traveling without supplies. This could contradict other passages emphasizing preparation and self-sufficiency. This tension highlights different contexts where faith and practicality are balanced differently in biblical narratives.