Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Jesus teaches to "resist not evil" and to turn the other cheek, promoting non-violence in contrast to acquiring a sword.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Jesus tells Peter to put his sword away and warns that those who take the sword will perish by the sword, advocating against violence.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
Paul instructs not to repay evil for evil and to live peaceably, contradicting the idea of preparing for potential violence.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Ephesians 6:12
This verse emphasizes that the battle is spiritual, not against flesh and blood, differing from the preparation for physical confrontation.
Ephesians 6:12: For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places]. [flesh...: Gr. blood and flesh] [spiritual...: or, wicked spirits] [high: or, heavenly]
Contradiction with James 4:1-2
This passage discusses wars and fights coming from desires, implying inner conflict rather than resolving through outer means like swords.
James 4:1-2: From whence [come] wars and fightings among you? [come they] not hence, [even] of your lusts that war in your members? [fightings: or, brawlings] [lusts: or, pleasures]
Paradox #1
Luke 22:36 could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency because it seems to encourage the use of weapons, which contrasts with other teachings of Jesus that promote peace, non-violence, and turning the other cheek. This difference can lead to confusion about whether followers should embrace pacifism or be prepared for self-defense.
Paradox #2
This verse could be seen as contradicting earlier teachings about non-violence and turning the other cheek. While Jesus previously emphasized peace and love, this verse suggests preparing for self-defense, which some might see as inconsistent with his earlier messages about non-violence and pacifism.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction with this verse is its apparent inconsistency with other teachings on non-violence in the Gospels. Earlier, Jesus teaches about turning the other cheek and loving enemies, which seems to conflict with the advice to be prepared with a sword in this verse. This could confuse readers about whether to follow a path of peace or self-defense.
Paradox #4
The contradiction may arise from the idea of encouraging the use of weapons, which contrasts with modern principles of conflict resolution that emphasize non-violence and peaceful dialogue.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen in how it seems to clash with the teachings of peace and non-violence that are central to other parts of the Bible and Jesus' message. Some may find it inconsistent with the idea of loving one's enemies and turning the other cheek. This could lead to confusion about whether to prioritize self-defense or to uphold the principles of peace.
Paradox #6
The contradiction involves resources and instructions: earlier in the Bible, Jesus teaches reliance on divine provision, telling followers they won't need money or weapons, while here he implies they should carry money and even buy a weapon if they don't have one. This seems inconsistent with his earlier message.