Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Matthew 5:17 suggests that Jesus did not come to destroy the law, which could contradict Luke 24:44 if interpreted in a way that questions fulfillment over continuation.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
Romans 10:4 states that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness, which could be seen as contradicting Luke 24:44's emphasis on fulfillment of the law and prophets.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
Hebrews 10:1 describes the law as a shadow and not the very image, potentially contradicting Luke 24:44's portrayal of fulfillment involving the law.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Galatians 3:24-25 explains that the law was a schoolmaster until Christ, implying a cessation that might seem at odds with the idea of fulfillment in Luke 24:44.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
Colossians 2:14 mentions the blotting out of the handwriting of ordinances, which could be seen as contradicting the notion of fulfillment in Luke 24:44.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;