Contradiction with Matthew 2:1
Luke 2:2 mentions a census during Quirinius's governorship, while Matthew 2:1 describes Jesus's birth during the reign of Herod, who died before Quirinius's governorship.
Matthew 2:1: Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,
Paradox #1
The timeline mentioned in Luke 2:2 regarding the census under Quirinius seems to conflict with historical records. Quirinius's census is documented to have happened after Herod's reign, creating a possible timeline issue with the nativity story in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The contradiction regarding this verse involves the timing of a census mentioned in connection with the birth of Jesus. According to historical records, Quirinius became the governor of Syria and conducted a well-documented census around 6 AD. However, Jesus is believed to have been born during the reign of King Herod, who died in 4 BC. This creates a timeline conflict, as there seems to be a significant gap between the events described and the historical records of the time.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction lies in the timing of the census mentioned in the verse. Historical records suggest that Quirinius, the governor linked with the census, conducted a well-documented census in 6-7 AD, which does not align with the timeline of Jesus' birth, typically estimated between 4-6 BC. This discrepancy raises questions about historical accuracy.
Paradox #4
Luke 2:2 presents a potential contradiction because it refers to a census that took place when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Historical records suggest that Quirinius became governor around 6 AD, but Jesus is traditionally believed to have been born around 4 BC. This creates a timeline conflict.