Contradiction with Matthew 10:34
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 by depicting Jesus as bringing a sword, representing conflict, rather than the fall and rising described in Luke.
Matthew 10:34: Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Contradiction with John 3:17
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 by stating Jesus did not come to condemn the world, contrasting with the notion of causing the fall of many.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Luke 19:10
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 by emphasizing Jesus’ mission to seek and save the lost, rather than leading to their fall.
Luke 19:10: For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 because it describes Christ as our peace, not as one causing division.
Ephesians 2:14: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:9
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 by saying God has not appointed us to wrath but to salvation, diverging from the idea of causing the rise and fall of many.
1 Thessalonians 5:9: For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,
Contradiction with John 12:47
This verse contradicts Luke 2:34 by stating Jesus came to save the world, not judge it, conflicting with the notion of causing many to fall.
John 12:47: And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
Paradox #1
The statement in "Luke 2:34" might seem contradictory to some people because it suggests that Jesus will cause both the rise and fall of many in Israel, which could be viewed as inconsistent with the idea of a universally peaceful and unifying Savior. Some might struggle to understand how Jesus’ mission can involve conflict or division. However, these perceived contradictions often arise from different interpretations or understandings of Jesus' role and mission.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in the context of this verse might stem from the idea that Jesus is both a source of blessing and division. On one hand, he is seen as the salvation and hope for humanity, bringing light and truth. On the other hand, his presence and teachings can lead to conflict and division among people, as not everyone will agree or accept his message. This dual impact can be morally puzzling because one might expect a purely positive force to only unite, not divide.