Contradiction with Matthew 5:38
Matthew 5:38 discusses the concept of "an eye for an eye," which can be seen as contradicting the idea of treating others as you would like them to treat you, as it suggests retaliation rather than empathy or kindness.
Matthew 5:38: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Contradiction with Exodus 21:23-25
These verses also refer to "eye for eye, tooth for tooth," advocating retributive justice instead of the unconditional kindness promoted in Luke 6:31.
Exodus 21:23-25: And if [any] mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:19-20
This passage, emphasizing reciprocal justice or equal retaliation, contrasts with the proactive kindness and empathy encouraged by Luke 6:31.
Leviticus 24:19-20: And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 19:21
This verse similarly supports a principle of direct retribution, which can oppose the notion of acting towards others with the same positive treatment you desire for yourself, as suggested in Luke 6:31.
Deuteronomy 19:21: And thine eye shall not pity; [but] life [shall go] for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Paradox #1
The contradiction might arise when someone feels that treating others as they wish to be treated could lead to personal harm or exploitation, especially if others do not reciprocate the same behavior. It can also be seen as conflicting when cultural or individual differences mean that what is desirable for one person may not be for another, creating inconsistency in applying this rule.