Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
This verse advises against retaliating in the same manner as others, whereas Luke 6:33 suggests doing good to those who do good to you.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Instructs to love and do good to enemies, contrasting Luke 6:33's reciprocal nature.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Tells not to repay evil with evil, while Luke 6:33 focuses on equal return of good.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Encourages not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult, unlike the conditional kindness in Luke 6:33.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
The Golden Rule advises treating others as you would want to be treated, which contrasts the reciprocal approach in Luke 6:33.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Luke 6:33 could be related to the idea of doing good to others who do good to you, which might seem to conflict with the broader biblical teaching of loving and doing good to all, including enemies. Some might see it as inconsistent with the message of unconditional love taught elsewhere.
Paradox #2
One potential concern might arise if someone views this verse in the broader context of biblical teachings on how to treat others who do not show kindness in return. Some might see a tension between this verse's message and other teachings that encourage unconditional love for enemies and doing good without expecting anything in return. The verse could be seen as emphasizing reciprocity, while other passages suggest a more selfless approach. However, this is largely a matter of interpretation and context within the broader biblical narrative.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction, inconsistency, or conflict in this context could relate to the broader biblical teachings that emphasize different motivations for doing good. In some parts of the Bible, good deeds are encouraged as acts of love and faith, while other teachings seem to emphasize rewards in heaven. This might create tension about whether acts should be selfless or expecting something in return.
Paradox #4
One possible contradiction in that verse could be the challenge of treating others well even when they do not treat you well. This can conflict with a natural desire for fairness or revenge, as people often feel inclined to respond in kind to negative behavior.