Contradiction with Proverbs 3:31
Encourages not to envy the oppressor, whereas Luke 6:35 speaks about loving enemies.
Proverbs 3:31: Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways. [the oppressor: Heb. a man of violence]
Contradiction with Psalm 139:21-22
Expresses hatred for those who hate God, contrasting with the call to love enemies in Luke 6:35.
Psalm 139:21-22: Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 19:2
Questions helping the wicked, while Luke 6:35 advocates for kindness to the ungrateful and evil.
2 Chronicles 19:2: And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? therefore [is] wrath upon thee from before the LORD.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:38
Mentions "an eye for an eye," which contradicts the notion of loving enemies in Luke 6:35.
Matthew 5:38: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
Supports the idea of retribution, contrary to the message of Luke 6:35, which emphasizes love for adversaries.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Paradox #1
Luke 6:35 could be seen as inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize justice and retribution, such as the Old Testament's "eye for an eye" principle. This verse promotes love and kindness towards enemies, which might seem contradictory to sections that focus on punishment and revenge. It's important to understand the context and overarching themes to reconcile these differences.
Paradox #2
Luke 6:35 encourages love and kindness even towards enemies, generally promoting unconditional love and generosity. Some interpret this as potentially conflicting with Old Testament passages that emphasize justice and retribution, such as the concept of "an eye for an eye." This perceived inconsistency can arise from differing views on justice versus mercy, or retributive versus restorative approaches to dealing with those who harm others.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction in that verse could be the challenge of loving enemies and doing good without expecting anything in return, which might conflict with natural human instincts for justice and fairness. People often feel it is right to seek fairness and reciprocation, so these teachings may seem inconsistent with everyday human experiences and societal norms.