Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
This verse advocates "an eye for an eye," endorsing retributive justice, which contradicts the mercy emphasized in Luke 6:36.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 19:21
It underscores the principle of lex talionis, promoting strict justice rather than the mercy called for in Luke 6:36.
Deuteronomy 19:21: And thine eye shall not pity; [but] life [shall go] for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:20
Also presents the idea of equal retaliation, conflicting with the unconditional mercy described in Luke 6:36.
Leviticus 24:20: Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him [again].
Contradiction with Psalm 137:9
Calls for vengeance, which contrasts with the forgiving nature urged in Luke 6:36.
Psalm 137:9: Happy [shall he be], that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. [the stones: Heb. the rock]
Paradox #1
Theological contradictions, inconsistencies, or conflicts are often subjective and depend on interpretation. However, some people might argue that showing mercy, as encouraged in this verse, could be seen as contradicting instances in the Bible where harsh justice or punishment is depicted, thereby creating a tension between justice and mercy. Others might see no contradiction, viewing mercy as a complementary aspect of divine justice. Overall, interpretations can vary widely among believers.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict could arise when trying to balance being merciful with the need for justice or accountability. People might find it challenging to show mercy to those who have done wrong while still maintaining fairness and upholding societal rules. This might seem inconsistent when trying to protect others or maintain order.